Before
Claims do not map cleanly to sourcesDraft claims, footnotes, source links, and notes exist, but gaps and weak evidence are not easy to see.
- Claims
- Sources
- Draft notes
New · New · Research
Review a draft for unsupported claims, weak citations, missing evidence, and source gaps that need attention.
USE CASE OUTCOME
Draft claims, footnotes, source links, and notes exist, but gaps and weak evidence are not easy to see.
DearClaw produces a claim inventory, evidence coverage map, missing citations, weak sources, and next checks.
HOW IT RUNS

QUICK ANSWERS
Review a draft for unsupported claims, weak citations, missing evidence, and source gaps that need attention.
Citation Gap Review is for teams working on research use cases in DearClaw.
Start with goal: Find citation gaps, material: Draft, references, requirements, and result: Citation gap review.
Citation Gap Review produces Claim inventory, Citation gaps, and Next checks.
Start with a draft, references, notes, or citation requirements. DearClaw maps claims to support and flags the gaps that should be fixed.
It fits repeatable knowledge work when the user can provide useful source material and review the result before acting. It should not replace final judgment, approvals, or source-of-truth systems.
The related section links to nearby DearStore use cases that share audience, category, or output intent.